Skip Navigation

Adaptation 2009 2(1):17-33; doi:10.1093/adaptation/apn025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

‘All the Rest Is Propaganda:’ Reading the Paratexts of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

Ian Brookes*

* Institute of Film & Television Studies, School of American & Canadian Studies, University of Nottingham. E-mail: ian.brookes{at}nottingham.ac.uk


   Abstract

Looking at two early editions of Alan Sillitoe's Saturday Night and Sunday Morning, we encounter what looks like two different books. One is the novel's first edition, published in hardback in 1958; the other is the first paperback edition, published in 1960 by Pan as a film tie-in. The literary text inside the covers is in each case the same: what is outside is different. The literary text is presented with certain accompanying productions which constitute what Gérard Genette has termed the ‘paratext’. Such productions include the book's title, its cover, the ‘blurb’ and all the paraphernalia surrounding the text itself. The paratext also includes material surrounding the literary text—such as reviews, interviews, posters, advertisements—which are not materially attached to the text. In both cases, the paratext provides what Genette calls ‘thresholds’ to the text which work to ‘frame’ our experience of it. In this essay I examine the paratexts of these two editions of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning to ascertain how and why they assumed their different ‘frames’. Although we traditionally study the literary text itself as the primary focus of investigation, what do we find if we shift our attention to the perimeters of that text? What was happening between 1958 and 1960 to make the same text appear so different? How did the film contribute to the paratextual reconstitution of the paperback, and vice versa?

Key Words: Paratextsillitoe • saturday night and sunday morning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.